WhyCan Forum

人过留名,雁过留声,感谢各位朋友不离不弃地支持。 QQ: 516333132 (挖坑网/填坑网) admin@whycan.cn

您尚未登录。

#1 2019-11-04 21:36:38

kekemuyu
会员
注册时间: 2018-12-13
累计积分: 304

常用cpu性能大比拼

手头有f1c100s,f1c200s,v3s,zerow。本次测试了v3s和zerow(sysbench),v3s比zerow稍微慢了点,频率都是1G,可能和v3s的ram太小有关,v3s的ram是64m,zerow是512m,差太多了。
v3s:

root@LicheePi:~# sysbench --test=cpu --cpu-max-prime=20000 run
sysbench 0.4.12:  multi-threaded system evaluation benchmark

Running the test with following options:
Number of threads: 1

Doing CPU performance benchmark

Threads started!
Done.

Maximum prime number checked in CPU test: 20000


Test execution summary:
    total time:                          730.7818s
    total number of events:              10000
    total time taken by event execution: 730.7642
    per-request statistics:
         min:                                 72.70ms
         avg:                                 73.08ms
         max:                                 79.48ms
         approx.  95 percentile:              74.25ms

Threads fairness:
    events (avg/stddev):           10000.0000/0.00
    execution time (avg/stddev):   730.7642/0.00

zerow

pi@raspberrypi:~/go/src/test $ sysbench --test=cpu --cpu-max-prime=20000 run
sysbench 0.4.12:  multi-threaded system evaluation benchmark

Running the test with following options:
Number of threads: 1

Doing CPU performance benchmark

Threads started!
Done.

Maximum prime number checked in CPU test: 20000


Test execution summary:
    total time:                          596.4347s
    total number of events:              10000
    total time taken by event execution: 596.4006
    per-request statistics:
         min:                                 59.52ms
         avg:                                 59.64ms
         max:                                157.06ms
         approx.  95 percentile:              59.71ms

Threads fairness:
    events (avg/stddev):           10000.0000/0.00
    execution time (avg/stddev):   596.4006/0.00

最近编辑记录 kekemuyu (2019-11-04 21:38:43)

离线

#2 2019-11-05 09:04:02

Gentlepig
会员
注册时间: 2018-10-24
累计积分: 229

Re: 常用cpu性能大比拼

zerow是什么?荔枝派zero?树莓派zero?
能否和imx6ull对比下?

离线

#3 2019-11-05 09:12:01

kekemuyu
会员
注册时间: 2018-12-13
累计积分: 304

Re: 常用cpu性能大比拼

Gentlepig 说:

zerow是什么?荔枝派zero?树莓派zero?
能否和imx6ull对比下?

树莓派zerow,没有i.mx6ull。欢迎有i.mx6ull的朋友比拼

离线

#4 2019-11-05 19:05:41

magusneo
会员
注册时间: 2019-06-22
累计积分: 17

Re: 常用cpu性能大比拼

应该有问题吧。zero是arm11,同频能比arm a7还快?

离线

#5 2019-11-05 20:28:30

kekemuyu
会员
注册时间: 2018-12-13
累计积分: 304

Re: 常用cpu性能大比拼

magusneo 说:

应该有问题吧。zero是arm11,同频能比arm a7还快?

实测就是这样,可能和linux版本不同有关。pizerow是4.19,licheepizero是4.13

最近编辑记录 kekemuyu (2019-11-05 20:31:46)

离线

#6 2019-11-10 15:29:24

kekemuyu
会员
注册时间: 2018-12-13
累计积分: 304

Re: 常用cpu性能大比拼

f1c200s的700m测试:

root@antbian:~/tool# sysbench --test=cpu --cpu-max-prime=20000 run
sysbench 0.4.12:  multi-threaded system evaluation benchmark

Running the test with following options:
Number of threads: 1

Doing CPU performance benchmark

Threads started!
Done.

Maximum prime number checked in CPU test: 20000


Test execution summary:
    total time:                          2553.1847s
    total number of events:              10000
    total time taken by event execution: 2553.0733
    per-request statistics:
         min:                                254.73ms
         avg:                                255.31ms
         max:                                574.51ms
         approx.  95 percentile:             255.38ms

Threads fairness:
    events (avg/stddev):           10000.0000/0.00
    execution time (avg/stddev):   2553.0733/0.00

最近编辑记录 kekemuyu (2019-11-10 15:32:25)

离线

#7 2019-11-10 15:31:38

kekemuyu
会员
注册时间: 2018-12-13
累计积分: 304

Re: 常用cpu性能大比拼

f1c200s比v3s满了三倍

离线

#8 2019-11-11 08:56:55

ifree64
会员
注册时间: 2019-06-27
累计积分: 9

Re: 常用cpu性能大比拼

我来发一个PC机上的测试数据,配置为R7 2700的KVM虚拟机,分配了8核和8G内存。不考虑sysbench的版本的话,速度是V3s的70倍。

sysbench --test=cpu --cpu-max-prime=20000 run
WARNING: the --test option is deprecated. You can pass a script name or path on the command line without any options.
sysbench 1.0.15 (using system LuaJIT 2.0.5)

Running the test with following options:
Number of threads: 1
Initializing random number generator from current time


Prime numbers limit: 20000

Initializing worker threads...

Threads started!

CPU speed:
    events per second:   686.40

General statistics:
    total time:                          10.0002s
    total number of events:              6865

Latency (ms):
         min:                                    1.31
         avg:                                    1.45
         max:                                    1.85
         95th percentile:                        1.52
         sum:                                 9947.28

Threads fairness:
    events (avg/stddev):           6865.0000/0.00
    execution time (avg/stddev):   9.9473/0.00

离线

页脚